The Shifting Sands of Power: From Elites to Trump and the People

In the United States, the balance of power has historically oscillated between various groups, shaped by economic, political, and social forces. One of the most dramatic shifts in recent times occurred with the election of Donald Trump in 2016, and again recently in 2024, which many interpret as a significant realignment from traditional power structures dominated by elites and bureaucracy to a more populist, people-centric model. 

For much of the 20th century, the U.S. political landscape was predominantly shaped by an elite class comprising business leaders, academics, politicians, and the bureaucratic apparatus. These groups, often educated in the same institutions, shared similar ideologies and social networks, forming what sociologist C. Wright Mills once called the “power elite.” This group wielded significant influence over policymaking, economic decisions, and the shaping of public discourse through media and educational systems.

The Rise of Trump and the People

Donald Trump’s ascent to the presidency again marks a radical departure from this elite-driven model. His campaigns are built on the promise of challenging the status quo, criticizing the “Washington establishment,” and directly addressing the grievances of the working class and middle America. Trump’s rhetoric resonates with voters who feel left behind by globalization, trade policies, and what they perceive as an unresponsive government. His slogan, “Drain the Swamp,” symbolizes his intent to dismantle the entrenched bureaucratic and political systems.

Mechanisms of Power Shift Toward the People

Trump utilizes social media and public rallies to bypass traditional media, directly communicating with voters. This direct line not only democratizes political discourse but also challenges the gatekeeping role of traditional media and political commentators. Trump’s administration pursues deregulation, tax reforms, and a more nationalist approach to trade, which are direct confrontations with the policies favored by bureaucratic and elite circles. His judicial appointments, particularly to the Supreme Court, also aim at shifting legal interpretations away from what he describes as ‘activist’ precedents. 

Trump Administration and Populists Facing Pushback from the Power Elite

The so-called “deep state,” a term used to describe entrenched bureaucratic entities, is accused of undermining Trump’s policies through leaks, slow walking of directives, and outright opposition, illustrating the tension between elected officials and long-standing bureaucratic power. Trump’s approach also touches on cultural battles, advocating for policies like immigration control and national sovereignty, which directly oppose the globalist and multicultural narratives championed by this power elite. This cultural realignment is as much about power as it was about policy.

The Shift is Deepening Political and Social Divides

Trump’s tenure accentuates the rift between urban elites and rural or working-class voters, with implications for social cohesion and governance. There is a marked decline in trust towards institutions like the media, academia, and the bureaucracy, seen by many as part of the elite structure. This skepticism leads to a broader questioning of authority and expertise. By focusing on issues like trade, immigration, and economic nationalism, Trump empowers groups previously less engaged in politics, giving voice to the frustrations of those who felt ignored by the political establishment. Internationally, Trump’s America First policy shifts alliances and trade relations, impacting global power dynamics and causing allies and adversaries alike to recalibrate their strategies concerning U.S. policy.

Power to the People

The shift from elite and bureaucratic control to a more people-oriented power structure in the U.S. represents a significant moment in American political history. It challenges the traditional notions of who holds power and how it is exercised. However, this shift also underscores the complexities of democracy, where the pendulum swings not only based on policy but also on perceptions of legitimacy, trust, and the ever-evolving definition of “the people.” As we move forward, this transition will continue to shape American politics, demanding a reevaluation of how power is shared, contested, and ultimately, who it serves.

Barry Pruett

Barry graduated from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, where he received his bachelor's degree with two majors - Russian Language and Culture & Diplomacy and Foreign Affairs. After graduation, he moved to Moscow where he worked as an import warehouse manager and also as the director of business development for the sole distributorship of Apple computers in Russia. In Prague, he was a financial analyst for two different distributorships - one in Prague and one in Kiev. Following this adventure, he graduated from Valparaiso University School of Law and is a litigation attorney for the past 18 years. During Covid, he completed his master's degree in history at Liberty University and is in the process of finishing his PhD with a focus on totalitarianism in the 20th century.

Previous
Previous

The Impacts of Immigration on the Labor Participation Rate

Next
Next

Nevada County Needs Internal Audits to Detect Potential Fraud